90-Day Federated Governance Proof of Value

A practical 90-day Proof of Value to test federated governance, Governance Domains, priority Data Products, the Data Dave journey and measurable business benefits before scaling.

Prove the operating model and consumer outcome before scaling

Days 0–30 — Baseline & Design

Select 1–2 meaningful Governance Domains. For the initial PoC / Proof of Value, consider Functional Unit as the starting type where the ownership policy assigns accountability by organisational function; if not, select the domain type that reflects the actual ownership boundary.

Agree central versus domain decision rights; identify the Sponsor, Governance Domain Owners, Data Product Owners, Stewards, Custodians and representative Consumers; select 5–15 priority Data Products; baseline Data Dave journeys; document current access and quality issues; define minimum metadata, role, access and measurement standards.

Days 31–60 — Establish

Configure the agreed domain structure and roles; register or scan agreed sources; establish relevant Data Products, assets, ownership, stewardship, glossary terms, Critical Data Elements (preview) where appropriate, classifications, lineage, Data Quality and access information where supported; create Guided Enablement and role checklists.

Days 61–90 — Test & Prove

Bring back the same consumer cohort; repeat comparable journeys; assess domain role adoption; compare discovery, understanding, ownership, trust, request, access and reuse; quantify evidenced benefits; capture lessons; present a scale/no-scale decision.

90-day exit criteria

  • Priority consumer journeys show a measurable improvement or a clear explanation of why they did not.
  • Governance Domain Owners, Product Owners and Stewards can perform their roles with documented guidance and realistic capacity.
  • At least one material benefit is evidenced, not merely asserted.
  • Known constraints, source limitations and integration gaps are documented.
  • Federated decision rights and cross-domain escalation are understood.
  • The operating model, costs and resource requirements for scale are understood.
  • The Sponsor has evidence to approve, reshape or stop the next phase.

The 90-day decision

Not: “Did we configure Purview?”

Instead: “Did the federated operating model improve accountability and the consumer journey, reduce friction or risk, and create enough measurable value to scale?”

12–18 month roadmap

  • 0–3 months — PROVE: pilot domains and decision rights, priority Data Products, baseline, consumer tests, initial role model and benefit evidence.
  • 3–6 months — ESTABLISH: formal operating model, domain hierarchy, minimum standards, stewardship community, Guided Enablement, support, governance forums and review cadence.
  • 6–12 months — SCALE: additional domains and products, cross-domain standards, CDEs (preview) where appropriate, more sources, DQ, lineage, governed access, metadata/API automation, wider adoption and reuse.
  • 12–18 months — OPTIMISE: health management, business-OKR alignment, lifecycle controls, consumer behaviour analytics, cross-domain interoperability, automation, benefits realisation and mature governed self-service.

Learning with Data SkyLab Studio

Follow practical Microsoft Purview and Data Governance learning from Data SkyLab Studio on YouTube.